Evaluation of a Method to Detect Peer Reviews Generated by #LLMs by CMU School of Computer Science researchers at #ILCR22 is the penultimate Day 3 “#AI for Detecting Problems, Assessing Quality in #PeerReview” presentation Learn more & register at peerreviewcongress.org! METRICStanford

Factors Assoc'd w Improper #RCT Registration, Reg Deficiencies, & Pub Status of The BMJ Submissions by David Blanco Sara Schroter Elizabeth Loder, MD, MPH Universitat Internacional de Catalunya is part of Day 3’s ‘#OpenScience, Protocol Availability, Registration’ session Register at peerreviewcongress.org!

Anonymizing Reviewers to Each Other in #PeerReview Discussions: A Randomized Controlled Trial from CMU School of Computer Science #compsci investigators is part of Day 2’s “Peer Review Models” session. Learn more and register at peerreviewcongress.org! #metaresearch METRICStanford The BMJ

Manuscript Characteristics Associated w Editorial Review & #PeerReview Outcomes at Science Magazine Science Advances from Nicholas Laberge Santa Fe Institute AAAS is part of Day 2’s 'Editorial and Publishing Processes and Models’ session Register at peerreviewcongress.org! #metaresearch

Results of Testing the Gold Standard 2-Week Reviewer Deadline at JCO Oncology Practice from ASCO editors is part of Day 2’s ‘#PeerReview Times and Payment Incentives’ session Learn more and register at peerreviewcongress.org! #metaresearch The BMJ METRICStanford

RCT Nonregistration, Discontinuation, Nonpublication in Europe & Canada: An Updated #MetaResearch Study from University of Basel The Division of Clinical Epidemiology Basel HEI is part of Day 3’s ‘#OpenScience, Protocol Availability, Registration’ session Learn more at peerreviewcongress.org!

Effect of Notifying Authors They've Cited a Retracted Article on Future Citations: An RCT of retracted.net from Nick DeVito Ben Goldacre Bennett Institute for Applied Data Science University of Oxford Nuffield Department of Medicine is part of Day 1’s 'Integrity Issues’ session Learn more at peerreviewcongress.org!

Assessment of an Intervention to Equalize Proportions of Funded Grant Applications for Underrepresented Groups CIHR IRSC from Clare Ardern University of British Columbia is part of Day 1’s 'Diversity & Research Environment’ session Learn more & register at peerreviewcongress.org! #DEI

Research Environment Indicators From the UK Research Excellence Framework Statements from Noémie Aubert Bonn Lukas Hughes-Noehrer Universiteit Hasselt The University of Manchester Computer Science @ The University of Manchester is part of Day 1’s "Diversity and Research Environment” session Learn more and register at peerreviewongress.org! #REF2029

Characterizing Problematic Images in Retracted Scientific Articles from Loyola Comp Sci Agenda Unicamp researchers is part of Day 1’s 'Research Misconduct and Integrity’ session. Register and learn more at peerreviewcongress.org! #metaresearch #scientificmisconduct

Developed by an international team of clinicians, researchers, and journal editors, the Chatbot Assessment Reporting Tool (CHART) is a guideline that includes 12 items and 39 subitems developed to provide reporting recommendations for studies evaluating the performance of

Exploring Views on Remuneration for #PeerReview: A Survey of @BMJ_latest Patient and Public Reviewers from Sara Schroter Emma Doble is part of Day 2’s 'Peer Review Models’ session. Learn more and register at peerreviewcongress.org! #MetaResearch #Pay4Review @jamanetwork

Take a look at the Advanced Analytics Dashboard of PRCT website to demonstrate trends and patterns in citing retracted articles: prct.xeradb.com/analytics/

Authorship Changes as an Indicator of Research Integrity Concerns in Submissions to Taylor & Francis Research Insights Academic Journals is part of Day 1’s Authorship and Integrity Issues session. Learn more and register at peerreviewcongress.org! #metaresearch #scientificintegrity The BMJ

Automating Detection of Promotional (Hype!) Language in Biomed Research from Érica Kido Shimomoto, Ph.D. 💁🏻‍♀️ AIST University of Tsukuba is part of Day 3’s ‘#AI for Detecting Problems and Assessing Quality in #PeerReview' Learn more & register at peerreviewcongress.org! The BMJ METRICStanford

Analysis of Decisions and Lead-Time in Ethical Review Boards in Sweden from Gustav Nilsonne and colleagues from #KarolinskaInstitut #StockholmU is part of Day 2’s 'Peer Review Times and Payment Incentives’ session Learn more and register at peerreviewcongress.org! #ethics

Investigating Changes in Common Vocabulary Terms in eLife - the journal Assessments Across Versions in a Publish, Review, Curate Model is part of Day 2’s 'Editorial and Publishing Processes and Models’ session Learn more and register at peerreviewcongress.org! #peerreview #metaresearch

Domain-Specific Pretrained Encoder Transformers for I.D. of Methodologically Rigorous Systematic Reviews: A Retrospective Modeling Study from Alfonso Iorio Brian Haynes HEI McMaster Health Sciences will be a poster presentation all 3 PRC days. Register @ peerreviewcongress.org!

Perceptions of Biomedical Journal EICs re: Use of #AI #Chatbots in #ScholarlyPublishing from lexbouter.bsky.social Herve Maisonneuve Alfonso Iorio Ana Marušić David Moher is a poster presentation all 3 PRC days Register to stop by, ask questions, say hello! peerreviewcongress.org

Perceptions of Use of #AI #Chatbots in Medical Journal #PeerReview: An International X-Sectional Survey from lexbouter.bsky.social Herve Maisonneuve Annette Flanagin Alfonso Iorio Ana Marušić David Moher is a poster presentation all 3 PRC days Register at peerreviewcongress.org!