If a user’s expectations about how a tool functions don’t match reality, you’ve got yourself a huge user experience and security problem. Humans have built a schema around AI chat bots and do not expect their AI chat bot prompts to show up in a social media style Discover feed —

Wow. Seems BAD. "We believe AppLovin has been backed since at least 2017 by Chinese national Hao Tang, who – through a web of offshore shell companies and aided by AppLovin’s vague if not deliberately obfuscated disclosures – controlled up to 28% of AppLovin Class A shares ahead

Part of the problem with the Meta AI app that might be tripping people up is that there is very little ‘warning’ for the Share-Post actions in this brand new app, for a brand new behavior. Also it just takes you back to the feed with little sense of what was just created/posted.

🚀 It’s finally out: the world’s first anti-deepfake wearable. 2025’s most-anticipated tech launch. It’s simple, it’s elegant, it’s versatile. And best of all: it’s 100% made up. Phew. 👉 wearthebox.com

Private valuations are guesses. Public markets often have a very different idea of value

I don’t know much about car maintenance - but I know to be skeptical of manufactured urgency. So when I get these “immediate attention” suggestions from the dealer, I just ask Claude who tells me they’re a waste of money. cc Mike Krieger

Please tell me this is possible

Great stuff on privacy and the Minnesota shootings from my pal Rob Leathern My big concern: when people are making really cheap products (like the doll Rob cites), can you really trust them with anything security or privacy related? Most IoT stuff I've used is garbage. But

Was thinking of getting my iris scanned in exchange for $40 in crypto this weekend. But will wait for them to clarify ToS (and tbh I probably need to understand Cayman Islands data protection laws a bit better to feel comfortable)

What’s a little friendly felony wiretapping among friends?