Nationalism and Socialism are incompatible, this goes for "Opressed people's nationalism" too.

"Appeals to authority" The authority in question: Marx🙃🙃🙃🙃🙃🙃 I appeal to Marx's scientific criteria because your criteria for determining a mode of production is pure vibes.

If I had known all it took to turn the U.S. economy socialist was to change the government's aesthetics, I would've become an interior designer.

Marx's own words: "In the social relations of production, the surplus of labour is not posited as . . . exchange value, but as surplus labour for the community." Eddy's(?) only criteria for determining a mode or production is state propaganda.

A few quotes from Marx, Engels, and Lenin which negate the idea that commodity production could exist under socialism: --- "Within the co-operative society based on common ownership of the means of production, the producers do not exchange their products; just as little does the

Fuck Stalin bitch ass. Fake ass socialist tricked generations of communist into his backward “theory “ of reformist bureaucracy and nationalism. A socialist Revolution killer

Turning politics into lifestyle is the surest sign of bourgeois influence, rebellion that reproduces the same system it claims to oppose.

Fascism’s “anti-capitalism” was theatrical, not material. It destroyed unions, preserved private capital, and replaced class struggle with national myth. Socialism abolishes exploitation; fascism aestheticizes it in the name of unity.

"indigenous people have a special connection to their land" [EXTREMELY LOUD INCORRECT BUZZER] "descendants of settlers must be made to leave colonized lands" [EXTREMELY LOUD INCORRECT BUZZER] "nationalism can be used as a tool for progress" [EXTREMELY LOUD INCORRECT BUZZER]

Feminism doesn’t contradict fascism; both reject materialism in favor of idealized identity categories. Even “Marxist feminism” can’t escape that trap, because it inherits feminism’s inversion of material relations.

"Marxist feminism just means historical materialism historical materialism"🙃 What is this argument? If feminism adds nothing then it's redundant and the term is still nonsensical.

When I can't tell the difference between pluralism and dialectics bc I'm a bourgeois Stalinoid.

Same line as the ACP. She either doesn't know what a mode of production is, or she's intentionally mystifying capitalism and socialism. Using her platform to misinform is no mistake. I've been saying she's an opportunist grifter for a while. She won't prove me wrong.