This may be obvious to some but I'm now convinced: fierce competition for grants and papers is leading to low societal ROI (return on investment). Why, when competition should mean only the best-formulated and executed work is accepted for funding and high-profile publication?

New practice abstract! 🐷 Imaging technologies like ultrasound, X-ray, & MRI let pig farmers assess body composition on-farm. This non-invasive method aids in managing fat & lean tissue for optimal carcass quality. Learn more 👉 bit.ly/3AfCuua

Context-specific regulatory variants matter in complex traits QGG AU Aarhus University

🧬 "Two subtle problems with over-representation analysis" highlights critical limitations in popular enrichment tools, e.g.: background reduction & false discovery rates. These challenges impact reliability of results in #RNAseq data analysis. doi.org/10.1093/bioadv…

What do we lose when we value brilliance so highly? I would argue a lot of potentially talented people but we can gain an unpleasant work environment occamstypewriter.org/athenedonald/2…

Rudi Fußi Wirklich jetzt? volksverpetzer.de/faktencheck/ko…

Part of the problem with „brilliance“ is that it focuses all attention on individuals. People actively engaged in science know that it is a team effort.

A new popular initiative wants to ban #AnimalExperimentation. This would significantly weaken Switzerland 🇨🇭 as a centre of research. Furthermore, animal testing could be relocated to countries with much less stringent welfare rules. ➡️ sohub.io/mk1w

🚀 Join our team at The Roslin Institute looking at validating AI designed genome edits for improving cattle traits. 🧬🐄 🔍 PhD in Molecular Biology? Experience in genome editing? We need you! elxw.fa.em3.oraclecloud.com/hcmUI/Candidat…

🔊Last chance, don't miss the deadline!