Perfect tweet

When you realise there’s a reason why entire North India rejoiced at the defeat of Marathas in Panipat. The Rajputs refused to fight by their side. The Naga Gosain Sadhus fought against them. The Hindu Jats, Gujjars & Ahirs looted the fleeing Maratha survivors after the battle.

If you look carefully, you will find that the black mark is only on Chittor and Mandalgarh which were under the Mughals, the red mark shows their (Maharana's) respective areas

Many copper plates and inscriptions of Maharana Pratap have been found which tell that Rana ji had won back the entire Mewar except Chittor and Mandalgarh.

Rima Hoja in her book A history of rajasthan writes that Maharana was in trouble till 1585 but he lived a comfortable life from 1585 to 1597 and he had conquered all the important regions Crop to sahi date ki kara kar

Not hard to understand why whole Hindostan rejoiced in the fall of Marathas in panipat.

Maharaja Jaichand was not a traitor (A Thread)

Marathiyo ko kabhi hinduo or hindu dharmi ke parwah nahi thi..inhe hamesh bs loot pat, paise or maharashtra se hi matlab tha...wo bhi baad mein nahi raha..kewal loot mar mein man laga raha inka

marathi shudar editing kar ke jhut failate hue ..waise jhut fareb or makari toh marathi gun hai.. x.com/ruthlessrathor…

Most of our MP/MLAs send their kids abroad the moment they have the means, studying at Eton, Wycombe, then graduating from Ivy Leagues. Yet they preach “Bharat First”, local tourism, and govt schools to the masses. Let alone army, they'd never volunteer to clean their locality.

Khaleej Mag 1. S Jaishankar is India's external affairs minister, not defense minister. 2. His half statement is published to promote fake propaganda. Here is his complete statement:

राजा मानसिंह आमेर 🚩

Rana Sanga died in 1528, while Akbar was born in 1542. The year difference between Rana Sanga's deaths and Akbar's birth is 14 years (1542 - 1528 = 14). However, Akbar became the Mughal emperor much later, in 1556, but according to this LOW IQ champu Akbar crusher Rana Sanga 🤡

Your source i.e. Capt. Franklin's Memoir on Bundelkhand clearly identifies Ahirs under "inferior tribes" alongside some of the untouchables. "Yaduvansi Ahir" here refers to those Ahirs who claimed to have a Yaduvansi lineage, which of course if you want can be unraveled also.

If Kalachuris weren’t Rajputs, then why is this Shudra kanging over Raghuji’s victory against the Kalachuri chief of Ratanpura? Bhonsles of Nagpur were illegitimate offsprings of Sisodiyas themselves, as confirmed by Lord Clive in his contemporary state papers of 1767 CE. 1/3 📜

Marathas were a small speck in the history of indian culture. It's like the saying that a bird flying in the sky thinks she is carrying the weight of the whole sky on her head.

Marathas looted temples, people. Rajput kings were building and restoring temples even before your ilk knew how to fight

the level of ignorance marathis have towards their own history is unbelievable

You are a chutiya who thinks maratha were there to defend hindustan..they were there to defend mugals... they were there to defend their dominance... and yes hindustan rejoiced fall of marathas cas marathis were looting and plundering hindustan.

marathis were given taste of freedom by Shiva bhosle ...Muslim were attacking India since 7th century...Muslims established in India after 1192....Indian culture survived 1000 years without marathas....only marathi culture survived because of them