rick waters (@watersrick) 's Twitter Profile
rick waters

@watersrick

Carnegie China

ID: 126506608

calendar_today26-03-2010 02:42:35

128 Tweet

671 Followers

630 Following

rick waters (@watersrick) 's Twitter Profile Photo

Singapore PM Wong - “the conditions that held the previous international order no longer hold” youtube.com/live/NUnJ940Ro…

Michael Pettis (@michaelxpettis) 's Twitter Profile Photo

1/3 My latest piece for Foreign Affairs argues that the global trading system was broken long before the Trump and Biden administrations set out to reform it. That's because while it is a system that benefits collectively from... foreignaffairs.com/world/global-t…

rick waters (@watersrick) 's Twitter Profile Photo

In private, some Trump officials concede that they did not accurately predict China’s reaction. Mr. Trump seemed to expect China to be among the first to come begging for relief, given the size of its exports to the United States. nytimes.com/2025/04/23/us/… via @NYTimes

rick waters (@watersrick) 's Twitter Profile Photo

Worth a read… Huge majority reject Beijing’s one country two system: poll - Taipei Times taipeitimes.com/News/front/arc…

Bonnie Glaser / 葛來儀 (@bonnieglaser) 's Twitter Profile Photo

Japan's former minister for econ security ('22-'24) Takaichi calls for new coalition: "Japan, Taiwan, Europe, Australia, India & other countries upholding democratic values should form a quasi-security alliance to protect each other's security and safety."focustaiwan.tw/politics/20250…

Sheena Chestnut Greitens (@sheenagreitens) 's Twitter Profile Photo

Delighted to put down a few thoughts with rick waters for Carnegie Endowment on the early contours of China's approach to the Trump administration: a strategic challenge Beijing should manage with resolve, not a crisis they should rush to fix: carnegieendowment.org/emissary/2025/…

Lingling Wei 魏玲灵 (@lingling_wei) 's Twitter Profile Photo

Beijing viewed the weekend talks less as an oppty to reset relations than as a chance to gauge whether the Trump administration intends to de-escalate. Beijing wants to keep talking to bring down tariffs, address new port fees.. w/Brian Schwartz wsj.com/politics/polic… via The Wall Street Journal

Gerard DiPippo (@gdp1985) 's Twitter Profile Photo

The US and China have a new framework to de-escalate. Whether that'll be durable is unclear. What is clear is that China can and will weaponize its export dominance. We discuss what the trade war teaches us about China's economy in our new RAND Commentary. 1/

The US and China have a new framework to de-escalate. Whether that'll be durable is unclear. What is clear is that China can and will weaponize its export dominance. We discuss what the trade war teaches us about China's economy in our new <a href="/RANDCorporation/">RAND</a> Commentary. 1/
Bonnie Glaser / 葛來儀 (@bonnieglaser) 's Twitter Profile Photo

This article by Christian Whiton is getting a lot of attention. I agree with some points. For eg, Taiwan should increase defense spending significantly beyond its current 2.5% level & consider extending the life of the Maanshan-2 nuclear power plant. But I also have

Rush Doshi (@rushdoshi) 's Twitter Profile Photo

China is winning the trade war. They have strong cards, but the truth is the Trump team inadvertently helped them. Per the The Wall Street Journal, the reason China massively escalated in the last 36 hours is because it believes Trump will fold - just as he did on magnets - without reaching for

Neil Thomas 牛犇 (@neilthomas123) 's Twitter Profile Photo

Who has Xi purged from the CCP Central Committee? Attendance at next week's Fourth Plenum will reveal the extent of his recent "purge surge" If all rumors are true, only 168/205 members (82%) and 159/171 alternates (93%) will be there And only 17/44 of PLA members (39%)! 1/

Who has Xi purged from the CCP Central Committee?

Attendance at next week's Fourth Plenum will reveal the extent of his recent "purge surge"

If all rumors are true, only 168/205 members (82%) and 159/171 alternates (93%) will be there

And only 17/44 of PLA members (39%)!

1/