🔥The 9th Round of Easy Loan, Earn $40 Reward is in progress❗️ ⏰ Promotion Period: January 15th - Feburary 15th, 2025 👉 Register now and check more details at gate.io/campaigns/358

“I too agree that we should have more innovators in this country, I just want to have a hard cap of $999m on returns” is a different way of saying “we should not have more innovators until we figure out how to reengineer human nature.”

what did you think degrowth meant? vibes? papers? essays?

This is accurate, in a way. If doctors were trained in nutrition, they’d know that research has shown that even w/intensive weekly counseling & supervised diet/exercise, mean weight loss settles at -5% of starting weight, so they’d prescribe GLP-1RAs and achieve 90% prevention.

Kanter’s law

This is a great idea. The big bet is that there are enough interesting use cases to cover. There probably are, but in any case, the compelling thing is that covering real-world use cases leads to more real-world use cases . I would have called it 'Existence Proofs.'

Reminds me of one of my favorite Munger quotes: "Most people have no hope of being improved by 'Poor Charlie's Almanack,' or anything else."

“ChatGPT psychosis” is not real. When someone is having a psychotic break and is talking to their Bluetooth headset or TV, we don’t call it “Bluetooth psychosis” or “TV psychosis” – it’s just psychosis. Separately, some people are too dumb to spot AI slop; that’s just stupidity.

[taps the sign]

AWS has struggled thus far in terms of customer-facing AI, but I suspect there are few better positioned to use AI internally. The corpus of structured internal writing is incredible training data – PRFAQs, design documents, 6-pagers – & docs are actually used to drive products.

If you don’t know accounting, it – like most technical subjects that are unfamiliar – seems like a dark art that you could have maybe learned if you had studied it in college or worked in investment banking. In reality, you can get to 95th percentile by reading two books:

My favorite prompt for getting to the bottom of any nutritional ““science”” claim: “is this observational epidemiology, or is it actual science?”

*taps*

Just a couple of minor tweaks!