Just tested on 2 different AI : what is the energy produced by the destruction of 1 g of antimatter. Both got it wrong. You have to point to them that it involves 2 g

"...et c'est pour ça qu'on enrichissait l'uranium à tours de bras." Ca arrangerait la cause des iraniens de ne pas prendre le reste du monde pour des débiles mentaux.

This is true. But you have to compute the logical implications : UN is a Kabuki theater. Borders will move. International laws are just words and pastimes for the weak.

Flashpoint war : the goal is not to push back against a front line but to change state. Here a first state change has been unlocked.

Depuis quand ça fait la une des journaux ? C'est plutôt quand il fonctionne qu'il faut nous avertir.

It sounds like it is ok to travel to Iran.

During WWII Japan looked for the decisive battle. They were lured into a faulty strategy because of their earlier success against Russia (Tsushima 1905). Beware to not think like japanese strategists in the 40s..

Imagine going back in time and telling these people the host of Celebrity Apprentice would be the guy who ended up bombing Iran

Volatility through the roof

Looks like school today : you don't have to find the move but to explain why it is a good move... It is a general trend : narrative taking over thinking.

The end of world order post WWII. Continued.

This exchanged made me laugh. At best you can say that Piers Morgan is hemiplegic in his thinking. He only sees dissuasion as a one way street. This is at the image of mainstream media. They are having a bad time thinking. They are projecting ideas to their adversaries rather

Who is escorting who ???

The plan was simple : 1 Cut federal spendings 2 Shut the border 3 Deport illegals 4 Stop forever war Maybe point 2 is holding, point 4 just blew out in the sky of the middle east and will make point 3 impossible and the beautiful obese deal choke point 1 At least

Suppose that Kamala would have won, the war with Iran

Is it because of the failed parade ?